Stratum9
LoginSignup
For HR Leaders

Can I defend this decision later if it’s challenged?

Every S9 InnerView interview leaves behind a documented, consistent record: the skill set used, the evidence behind every score, and the interviewer’s own notes, reviewed by a person before it becomes a decision. That’s not a compliance claim. It’s what gets automatically captured, every time, whether or not anyone ever asks to see it.

Request the Science & Compliance packet
A flow from what was used, evidence captured, and interviewer notes, into a center marked every interview, every step, automatically captured, out to a complete interview record listing skill set used, evidence behind every score, interviewer’s notes, and reviewed by a person, with a note underneath that this is not a compliance claim.

How It Works, Step by Step

Every step, on the record.

Every hire should be explainable after the fact, not reconstructed from memory.

01

Step 1

Build

The hiring manager sets the skill structure once per role.

02

Step 2

Interview

Every interviewer works within that same structure.

03

Step 3

Document

Decision paths, scoring rationale, and interviewer notes get captured automatically, as a byproduct of the process itself.

04

Step 4

Review

A person checks the record before it becomes a final decision.

Live record
Build

Skill structure: Senior Product Designer

Communication, Systems thinking, Craft
  • JLJordan Lee
  • RMRiley Morgan
  • Decision path logged
  • Scoring rationale saved
  • Interviewer notes captured
Byproduct of the process
ApproveRequest more detail

What’s Captured, Automatically

Captured automaticallyYou’d otherwise have to reconstruct
Decision paths
From memory, months later
Scoring rationale
From scattered, informal notes
Interviewer notes
From someone who may have since left
Competency alignment
From nothing at all
A gold shield with a checkmark, connected to four glowing badges for EEOC Guidance, NYC Local Law 144, ADA, and BIPA, beside a laptop showing an interview scorecard with Select Skills, Score Consistently, and Review Fairly each checked off.
The Record Carries the Reasoning

“Defensible” is the word that actually matters here, not “accurate” or “fair” on their own, but whether you could explain a specific hiring decision, in detail, if it were ever challenged. The file already exists before anyone asks for it. That’s the entire point.

An HR leader at her laptop next to a shield icon connected to EEOC Guidance, NYC Local Law 144, ADA, and BIPA, with a second card listing the bias-and-ethics approach and how candidate data is handled.

Compliance-by-Design, Not Compliance-by-Claim

S9 InnerView is designed with EEOC guidance, NYC Local Law 144, the ADA, and BIPA in mind, shaping how skills are selected, scored, and reviewed. That’s design intent, not a claim of certification. See Responsible AI for the bias-and-ethics approach in full, and Security & Trust for how candidate data is actually handled.

Request the Science & Compliance packet

Frequently asked questions

Decision paths, scoring rationale, interviewer notes, and competency alignment, captured for every hire, automatically, as part of the normal process rather than assembled under pressure after the fact.

InnerView is designed with EEOC guidance and regulations like NYC Local Law 144 in mind, shaping how skills are selected, scored, and reviewed. That reflects design intent, not a specific completed certification; see Responsible AI and Security & Trust for exactly what that does and doesn’t mean today.

Request the full methodology and compliance-design documentation behind every InnerView hire.

Request the Science & Compliance packet
🎧  You made it this far

Still here? Respect.

You've read more than most interviewers read job descriptions.
Take five, here's something to listen to that isn't a cue card.

Listen on Spotify
Focus & Flow24 tracks · 1 hr 42 min